API Build-data JSON Resources
Theme

Choose how MSRBot.io looks on this device.

Preference is stored in this browser only.

SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007)
[ACTIVE]

The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974

Metadata

Publisher
SMPTE — White Plains, NY, USA
Doc Type
Journal Article
Content Type
Original Research
Abbreviated Title
SMPTE Mot. Imag. J
Volume
116, No. 2-3, pp. 87–103
Abstract
This historical paper reviews the evolution of cinema lens designs over 60 years, including the recession of the cinema business from 1955 to 1963.1 As a product, cinema lenses are required for all cinema or studio film projection, but were always a sideline of larger optical firms and accorded secondary priority. Such lenses were judged by the on-axis resolution in the optics lab, yet cinema screen image resolution was always found to be only a fraction of the test result of the optics lab.
Publication Date
2007-02-01
DOI
10.5594/J16098
ISSN
Print: 1545-0279 | Electronic: 2160-2492
Link
https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098
Author(s)
Glenn Berggren
bio
Glenn Berggren , a Life Fellow of SMPTE, entered the cinema equipment industry in 1962 by joining Kollmorgen Optical. After ten years with firms such as Chrysler (car engineering) and General Electric (stereosound), he accepted the challenge of nonmilitary marketing with Kollmorgen, the submarine periscope manufacturer. After two years with Kollmorgen he became the cinema industry “lens-man.” Because of complaints about faulty screen images, he sought answers from the specialists at Kodak, Century, Strong, Simplex, and other cinema equipment suppliers, but basic answers were not found. Between 1962 and 1974 he completed Ultra-Vision and other major R&D programs and inventions. After 1974, he led the development of three sets of new concepts for ISCO lenses. Berggren is solely responsible for six different cinema lens series. He moved to Wil-Kin/Atlanta, in 1968, to join the Ultra-Vision R&D program. He later went to ISCO in 1976, then Optical Radiation Corp. in 1980. Berggren obtained six Academy Technical Awards for screen image factors, two for Kollmorgen, one for Ultra-Vision HD, plus three for ISCO lens series. His primary contributions to the cinema industry are the permanent change in design concepts for all film cinema lens designs, the six lens series, the RP 40 test film, plus SMPTE performance standards of the Theatrical Projection Technology Committee, where he was chair on four separate occasions. He has authored over 100 articles and technical papers, and continues to work as a consultant.
Copyright
© 2007 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.

Bibliographic Reference(s)

  • Modulated Air Blast for Reducing Film Buckle [Active]
  • Improving 35mm Theater Projection [Active]
  • New Concepts and Picture Quality of a 35mm Curved-Screen Shopping Center Theater [Active]
  • On Optimizing Screen Curvature in a Front-Projection Indoor Theater [Active]
  • The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 1: The Postwar Cinema: 1945 to 1962 [Active]
  • Effect of Gate and Shutter Characteristics on Screen Image Quality [Active]
  • 1. See appendix for industry data. EXTERNAL
  • 10. The Kollmorgen 7-element f/1. 7 had the usual single back lens, then a doublet then another doublet, but rather than a single front element, it had a third doublet, which raised the resolution and much increased the overall light throughput as compared to any other American cinema lens. EXTERNAL
  • 11. The Kollmorgen Lens Selector was designed around the typical cinemas and lenses of the time. Lenses were 1 1/4 in. to 9 in. on the indoor side, with pictures sizes up to 50 ft. × 90 ft., and larger on the drive-in side. This design was copied about 1970 and marked with the name A. P. Goertz, a subsidiary of Kollmorgen, and copied again in 1973 by Schneider Corp. of America. EXTERNAL
  • 12. The changes in the Kollmorgen lens line are as follows: The BX163 and BX 294 were dropped by 1965 . The new red B247 was exactly the same as the BX 241–6 element lens but with an f/2. 1 internal stop. The new red B297 was exactly the same as the BX 290–7 element lens but with an f/2. 0 internal top. The new blue B293 was the same as the BX 290–7 element lens with either an f/2. 4 or f/3. 0 internal stop, and only used by UltraVision. EXTERNAL
  • 13. The KA 298 was a high-performance 4-element cylindrical anamorphic attachment provided by Kosaka, and allowing Kollmorgen to eliminate the “dependence” by dealers on the Bausch & Lomb anamorphic. EXTERNAL
  • 14. All references to “Best Picture” are from 60 Years of Oscar by Robert Osborne , Abbeville Press : New York , 1989 . EXTERNAL
  • 15. The original CinemaScope projection format image dimensions were 0. 715 in. × 0. 912 in. with 2X attachment (for horizontal magnification only). It was changed in 1954/55 to 0. 71 in. × 0. 839 in. with the same attachment. EXTERNAL
  • 16. Goetz William , New Screen Techniques , Quigley Publishing : New York , p. 202 , 1953 . EXTERNAL
  • 17. Berggren G. M. , Changing Requirements in Projection Optics, Motion Picture Exhibitor , Quigley Publishing : New York , pp. 20 – 22 , April 7, 1965 . EXTERNAL
  • 18. The optical bench test was a magnified view through the lens to inspect an optical pattern for resolution. EXTERNAL
  • 19. Burlinson John , Motion Picture Herald , Quigley Publishing : New York , pp. 33 – 36 , May 22, 1968 . EXTERNAL
  • 20. TEDA (Theatre Equipment Dealers Association) and TESMA (Theatre Equipment Supply and Manufacturers Association), merged to form TEA, Theatre Equipment Association in 1971 . EXTERNAL
  • 22. The set of light readings was the forerunner of SMPTE RP 98, with the light meter at three places in the middle row and three places in the rear row to three or more readings across the screen. EXTERNAL
  • 24. Kloepfel Don V. , “Motion Picture Projection and Theatre Presentation Manual,” SMPTE , 9 East 41st Street, New York, NY , 10017 . EXTERNAL
  • 26. The OptiVerter was created to eliminate the projection window. A sheet metal box with sound-proofing within, it included a two-mirror reflection system on each side (for two projectors), one fixed and one adjustable, with an operational control panel on the front. The name OptiVerter was registered. EXTERNAL
  • 27. The idea of Skip-Frame was to reduce film cost. The film format was half-frame, like Techniscope, with the projector showing every other film frame. Then, when halfway through, the film was reversed. EXTERNAL
  • 28. The split-adjustable mirror was in two halves, each separately adjustable. The mini-sized secondary mirror was one piece mounted on a separately adjustable post, on the opposite side of the vertical xenon bulb. It would take several hours to obtain a “best” adjustment, and was subject to simple mis-adjustment. EXTERNAL
  • 29. Described in “Debut Deluxe in Savannah,” Berggren Glenn , Motion Picture Herald , Quigley Publishing : New York , pp. 18 – 20 , Feb. 12, 1969 . EXTERNAL
  • 3. Mitchell Robert A. Robert A. Mitchell's Manual of Practical Projection , International Projectionist Publishing Co. : New York , pp. 123 – 131 , 1956 . EXTERNAL
  • 30. Burlinson John , Motion Picture Herald , Quigley Pubishing : New York , pp. 29 – 32 , Nov. 5, 1969 . EXTERNAL
  • 31. The “Projection Alignment and Image Quality Test Film” (35PA) RP 40 expanded its use nationally and internationally, to become the highest grossing test film for SMPTE, often back-ordered. EXTERNAL
  • 4. The 1. 75 aspect ratio was for non-CinemaScope films with frames that had dimensions of 0. 472 in. × 0. 825 in. The 1. 66 aspect ratio was for non-CinemaScope films that had dimensions of 0. 497 in. × 0. 825 in. The older 1. 37 format dimensions were 0. 600 in. × 0. 825 in. The later 1. 85 format dimensions are 0. 446 in. × 0. 825 in. EXTERNAL
  • 5. The General Precision Equipment Corp of New York City, NY (in 1960 ). EXTERNAL
  • 8. The film emulsion absorbed over 95% of heat energy and, like a bi-metallic strip, bulged the same way. EXTERNAL
  • 9. Carver E. K. Talbot R. H. Loomis H. A. , “Effects of High Intensity Arcs Upon 35mm Film Projection,” J. SMPE , XLI : 69 , July 1943 ; F. J. Kolb, “Air Cooling of Motion Picture Film for Higher Screen Illumination,” J. SMPE, LIII:635, Dec. 1949. EXTERNAL
Source Data (JSON)

Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-J16098.json

Reference Tree

Explore all references and references to this document, as a navigable tree.

Open Reference Tree
Reference this Doc

Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
Glenn Berggren; The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007); SMPTE, 2007. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098
Snippet:
Glenn Berggren; The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007); SMPTE, 2007. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098

HTML (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
Glenn Berggren; The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007); SMPTE, 2007. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098
Snippet:
<span class="citation">Glenn Berggren; <cite>The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974</cite>, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007); SMPTE, 2007. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098</a></span>

SMPTE Icon SMPTE's HTML Pub

Preview:
Glenn Berggren; The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007); SMPTE, 2007
doi: 10.5594/J16098
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/J16098
Snippet:
<li>
Glenn Berggren; <cite id="bib-10-5594-j16098">The Evolution of the Cinema Lens—Part 2: The Cinema Revival: 1962–1974</cite>, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 116, Issue: 2-3, 2007); SMPTE, 2007
<span class="doi">10.5594/J16098</span>
</li>