Current document root:
SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 123, Issue: 5, July 2014)
Advanced Clean Audio Solution: Dialogue Enhancement
SMPTE • Journal Article • [Active]
Click a document below to open its own reference tree.
Referenced By
Docs that depend on Advanced Clean Audio Solution: Dialogue Enhancement
View:
·
Tree:
·
Level 1 — direct dependents (docs that cite this doc)
References Of
Docs that Advanced Clean Audio Solution: Dialogue Enhancement depend on
View:
·
Tree:
·
Level 1 — direct references (docs this doc cites)
- 1. Green P. “Loudness Normalisation Benefits Study,” Loudness Summit London , Dec. 2011 .EXTERNAL
- 10. Hellmuth O. Engdegård J. Falch C. Herre J. Hilpert J. Hölzer A. Koppens J. Mundt H. Oh H. Purnhagen H. Resch B. Terentiev L. Valero M. Villemoes L. “MPEG Spatial Audio Object Coding—The ISO/MPEG Standard for Efficient Coding of Interactive Audio Scenes,” 129th AES Convention, Nov. 2010 .EXTERNAL
- 11. Meltzer S. “Dialog Enhancement—A New Approach,” Nordig Sound Symposium , Sept. 2011 , http://www.nrk.no/soundsymp/2011_Meltzer.html .EXTERNAL
- 12. Meltzer S. Bustad C. “Trials with Dialogue Enhancement for Webradio and TV Sound,” EBU Production Seminar , Feb. 2012 , https://tech.ebu.ch/events/pts2012/pid/11774 .EXTERNAL
- 13. Fuchs H. Meltzer S. Ridderbusch F. Tuff S. “Dialog Enhancement— Enabling User Interactivity with Audio,” NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference , April 2012 .EXTERNAL
- 14. Fuchs H. Tuff S. Bustad C. “Dialogue Enhancement— Technology and Experiments,” EBU Tech. Rev. , June 2012 , https://tech.ebu.ch/docs/techreview/trev_2012-Q2_Dialogue-Enhancement_Fuchs.pdf .EXTERNAL
- 15. ANSI, 2003, S3.22-2003 , “Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics.”EXTERNAL
- 16. Wagener K. Brand T. Kollmeier B. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests,” Z. Audiol , 38 ( 3 ): 86 – 95 , 1999 .EXTERNAL
- 2. Heger D. Holube I. “Wie viele Menschen sind schwerhörig?” Z. Audiol. , 49 ( 2 ): 61 – 70 , 2010 .EXTERNAL
- 3. Kochkin S. “MarkeTrak VII: Hearing Loss Population Tops 31 Million People,” Hearing Rev. , 12 ( 7 ), 2005 .EXTERNAL
- 4. Hougaard S. Ruf S. “EuroTrak I: A Consumer Survey about Hearing Aids in Germany, France and the UK,” Hearing Rev. , 18 ( 2 ): 12 – 28 , 2011 , http://www.hearingreview.com/2011/02/eurotrak-i-a-consumer-survey-about-hearing-aids-in-germany-france-and-the-uk/ .EXTERNAL
- 5. Jansen S. Luts H. Wagener K. C. Kollmeier B. Del Rio M. Dauman R. James C. Fraysse B. Vormes E. Frachet B. Wouters J. van Wieringen A. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study,” Int. J. Audiol. , 51 ( 3 ): 164 – 173 , 2012 .EXTERNAL
- 6. Brand T. Kollmeier B. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 111 ( 6 ): 2801 – 2810 , 2002 .EXTERNAL
- 7. Florentine M. “Speech Perception in Noise by Fluent, Non-native Listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 77 ( S1 ): S106 – S106 , 1985 .EXTERNAL
- 8. Warzybok A. Wagener K. Brand T. Kollmeier B. “Influence of the Linguistic Complexity in Relation to Speech Material on Non-native Speech Perception in Noise,” DAGA 2010 , Berlin .EXTERNAL
- 9. ISO/IEC 23003-2 , 2010 , “Information Technology—MPEG Audio Technologies— Part 2: Spatial Audio Object Coding (SAOC).”EXTERNAL