Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast

Metadata

Publisher: SMPTE — White Plains, NY, USA
Doc Type: Journal Article
Content Type: Original Research
Abbreviated Title: SMPTE Mot. Imag. J
Volume: 123, No. 5, pp. 44–51
Abstract: This paper presents an empirical study of the differences between level normalization of programs using the two dominant methods: loudness normalization and speech (“dialog”) normalization. Instead of adding to the continuing debate of the subjective merits of one method over the other, important technical aspects are examined here. The difference in normalization level between the two measures was up to 14 dB. For all films and programs, the loudness method provided the greatest headroom. All programs and a majority of the films could be broadcast at a fixed target level of −24 LKFS (loudness, K-weighted, relative to full scale) without dynamics processing. When it was speech normalized, not a single film could be broadcast at that target level without applying dynamics processing. The study furthermore found a systematic difference between manual speech measurement and automatic speech measurement. Uncertainties in classification, definition, and measurement are described and compared to the requirements for precision in the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) and the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) loudness-based standards.
Publication Date: 2014-07-01
DOI: 10.5594/j18432
ISSN: Print: 1545-0279
Link: https://doi.org/10.5594/j18432
Author(s): Thomas Lund
Esben Skovenborg
Copyright: © 2014 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.

Bibliographic Reference(s)

1. Nielsen S. H. Lund T. “Level Control in Digital Mastering,” Proc. 107th AES Convention , New York, NY , 1999 . EXTERNAL
10. ATSC , “Techniques for Establishing and Maintaining Audio Loudness for Digital Television,” Doc A/85, Advanced Television Systems Committee , Washington, DC , 2013 . EXTERNAL
11. Belger E. “The Loudness Balance of Audio Broadcast Programs,” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society , 17 ( 3 ): 282 – 285 , 1969 . EXTERNAL
12. EBU , “EBU Technical Recommendation R128. Loudness Normalisation and Permitted Maximum Level of Audio Signals,” European Broadcasting Union , Geneva , 2010 . EXTERNAL
13. Lund T. “DTV, Mobile TV and the Downmix Dilemma,” Proc. 27th Tonmeistertagung , Cologne, Germany , 2012 . EXTERNAL
14. Boron W. Boulpaep E. Medical Physiology ( 2nd ed. ), Elsevier : Amsterdam , 2011 . EXTERNAL
15. Küpfmüller K. “Nachrichtenverarbeitung im Menschen,” in Taschenbuch der Informatik , Springer : Berlin , 1974 . EXTERNAL
2. Nielsen S. H. Lund T. “Overload in Signal Conversion,” Proc. 23rd Int. AES Conference , Copenhagen, Denmark , Paper &num;11, 2003 . EXTERNAL
3. Lund T. “Specifying Audio for HD,” Proc. NAB BE Conference , Las Vegas, NV , 2007 . EXTERNAL
4. ITU-R , “Recommendation ITU-R BS.1770-3: Algorithms to measure Audio Programme Loudness and True-Peak Audio Level,” International Telecommunication Union , Geneva , 2012 . EXTERNAL
5. Jones B. L. Torick E. L. “A New Loudness Indicator for Use in Broadcasting,” Proc. 71st AES Convention , Montreux, Switzerland , 1982 . EXTERNAL
6. Ortner R. “Je lauter desto bumm&excl;—The Evolution of Loud,” M.A. Thesis, Donau Universität, Krems, 2012 . EXTERNAL
7. Skovenborg E. Lund T. “Level-Normalization of Feature Films Using Loudness vs Speech,” Proc. 135rd AES Convention , New York, NY , 2013 . EXTERNAL
8. Lund T. “Audio for Mobile TV, iPad and iPod,” Proc. NAB BE Conference , Las Vegas, NV , 2013 . EXTERNAL
9. Sony Computer , “Average Loudness and Peak Levels of Audio Content on Sony Computer Entertainment Platforms,” Recommendation ASWG R001 , London , 2013 . EXTERNAL

Source Data (JSON)

Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-j18432.json

Reference Tree

Explore all references and references to this document, as a navigable tree.

Open Reference Tree

Reference this Doc

Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:

Thomas Lund and Esben Skovenborg; Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 123, Issue: 5, July 2014); SMPTE, 2014. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/j18432

Snippet:

Thomas Lund and Esben Skovenborg; Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 123, Issue: 5, July 2014); SMPTE, 2014. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/j18432

HTML (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:

Snippet:

<span class="citation">Thomas Lund and Esben Skovenborg; <cite>Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast</cite>, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 123, Issue: 5, July 2014); SMPTE, 2014. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/j18432" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/j18432</a></span>

SMPTE's HTML Pub

Preview:

Thomas Lund and Esben Skovenborg; Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 123, Issue: 5, July 2014); SMPTE, 2014
doi: 10.5594/j18432
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/j18432

Snippet:

<li>
Thomas Lund and Esben Skovenborg; <cite id="bib-10-5594-j18432">Loudness vs. Speech Normalization in Broadcast</cite>, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 123, Issue: 5, July 2014); SMPTE, 2014
<span class="doi">10.5594/j18432</span>
</li>