Current document root:
SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 110, Issue: 5, May 2001)
On Scanning Format and MPEG-2 Coding Efficiency
SMPTE • Journal Article • [Active]
Click a document below to open its own reference tree.
No entries.
Level 1 — direct references (docs this doc cites)
- 1. Engstrom E. W. , “A study of Television Image Characteristics: Part Two. Determination of Frame Frequency for Television in Terms of Flicker Characteristics,” Proc. of the IRE , 23 : 295 – 310 , 1935 .EXTERNAL
- 10. de Haan G. , 1999 , “IC for Motion-Compensated De-Interlacing, Noise Reduction and Picture-Rate Conversion,” IEEE Tr. on Consumer Electronics , pp. 617 – 624 , Aug. 1999 .EXTERNAL
- 11. MPEG Software Simulation Group (MSSG) , Software for MPEG-2 coding and decoding, http:/www.mpeg.org/pointers/MSSG .EXTERNAL
- 12. Cuvelier L. , “Analysis, Coding and Processing of Interlaced Pictures,” Ph.D. thesis, Universite Catholique de Louvain , Belgium , (in French), 1998 .EXTERNAL
- 13. de Haan G. Bellers E. B. , 1999 , “Towards a Fair Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Interlaced and Progressive Video,” Proc. of the Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference , 3653: 559 – 567 , San Jose, CA, 1999.EXTERNAL
- 14. Karan V. Konstantinides K. , Image and Video Compression Standards — Algorithms and Architectures , Kluwer Academic Publishers , 1995 .EXTERNAL
- 15. Wu H. R. Yuen M. , “Quantitative Quality Metrics for Video Coding Blocking Artifacts,” Proc. of the Int. Picture Coding Symposium, Melbourne (Australia) 1996 , pp. 23 – 28 .EXTERNAL
- 16. Rec. 500-4, “Method for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures,” 1990 .EXTERNAL
- 2. Pigeon S. Guillotel P. , “Advantages and Drawbacks of Interlaced and Progressive Scanning Formats,” Tech. Report HAMLET, R2110/WP2/DS/R/004/b1, RACE 2110, 1996 .EXTERNAL
- 3. Dubois E. de Haan G. Kurita T. , “Motion Estimation and Compensation Technologies for Standards Conversion,” Signal Processing: Image Communication , 6 : 189 – 192 , 1994 .EXTERNAL
- 4. Vandendorpe L. Cuvelier L. Maison B. Delogne P. , “Coding of De-interlaced Image Sequences,” Int. Conf. on Image Processing , 2 : 943 – 946 , 1994 .EXTERNAL
- 5. Muratori M. Stroppiana M. Nishida Y. , “Coding Efficiency of Systems Adopting Progressive De-interlaced and Interlaced Formats,” Signal Processing of HDTV , pp. 533 – 541 , 1994 .EXTERNAL
- 6. Guillotel P. D'Agostino G. , “Towards the Use of a Progressive Transmission Format,” Proc. of the Intl. Workshop on HDTV and the Evolution of Television, Taipei, Nov. 1995 , pp. 4A : 31 – 38 , 1995 .EXTERNAL
- 7. de Haan G. Bellers E. B. , “De-interlacing: An Overview,” Proc. of the IEEE , 86 : 1839 – 1857 , Sept. 1998 .EXTERNAL
- 8. de Haan G. Kettenis J. De Loore B. , “IC for Motion-Compensated 100 Hz TV with Natural-motion Movie Mode,” IEEE Tr. on Consumer Electronics , pp. 165 – 174 , May 1996 .EXTERNAL
- 9. Wu H. R. Yuen M. , “A Generalized Block-edge Impairment Metric for Video Coding,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters , 4 ( 2 ), pp. 317 – 320 , Nov. 1997 .EXTERNAL