API Build-data JSON Resources
Theme

Choose how MSRBot.io looks on this device.

Preference is stored in this browser only.

SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999)
[ACTIVE]

The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?

Metadata

Publisher
SMPTE — White Plains, NY
Doc Type
Conference Paper
Content Type
Original Research
Volume
1999, No. 7, pp. 180–192
Abstract
MPEG-2 MP@ML will play an important role not only for distribution purposes but for the contribution of TV - contents to the main broadcast centers. It's the base for DTV in the US and DVB in Europe. This fact is very often used to assert that the use of MPEG-2 MP@ML - signals within television studios will become mandatory. To check the validity of these arguments, this paper analyses the problems, which are related to such an approach, and their proposed solutions. It is the task of this paper to discuss the implications for typical operational practices within TV-studios, which are arising with the proposed use of MPEG-2 MP@ML. This type of signal should not be confused with the MPEG-2 4:2:2 P@ML professional studio-format at 50 Mbit/sec, which was especially created for the use within TV-studios. Two opposite statements are made at the present time: MPEG-2 MP@ML is a distribution and transmission format and therefore not suited for the operational procedures within a TV-studio. Above assertion is a pure prejudice, an opinion without analyzing the facts. Mid of the eighties a similar discussion took place. Two camps fought over standards for a new digital studio format. The arguments used were quite similar to the ones used today in the battle over MPEG-2 MP@ML for studio use. PAL/NTSC are distribution formats. The operational procedures within TV-studios can only be performed by using digital component signals. Due to the fact that PAL/NTSC are used for distribution, it would be very beneficial to remain in these composite formats for studio applications in the digital domain as well. Today we know that technological progress together with changed operational needs and practices has proven right those people who argued in favor for giving up the identity of studio signal and distribution signal. It is not without historical irony that today we would never discuss a possible use of the MPEG-2 MP@ML distribution format for use within TV-studios without abandoning the distribution formats PAL/NTSC for production purposes. Nevertheless, on the basis of the historical similarities of the used arguments, it will be of interest to draw a comparison between the distribution formats PAL/NTSC and MPEG-2 MP@ML for studio applications.
Publication Date
1999-07-01
DOI
10.5594/M001190
Link
https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190
Author(s)
Jüergen HeitmannAV Media Technology - Consultants
bio
Dr.-Ing. Jürgen Heitmann studied communication technique at the university in Braunschweig, Germany. He joined BOSCH EERNSEH in Darmstadt, Germany, in 1973, which became part of PHILIPS BTS, today known as Philips DVS. During the years he served in different upper level management positions in advanced development, product development, product planning and product management. Amongst others he was responsible for the development of the D1 Digital-VTR. Since 1997 Dr. Heitmann is running his own consulting company AV MEDIA TECHNOLOGY. Dr. Heitmann is fellow of the SMPTE and presently Governor of the Society for Europe, The Middle East, Africa and Central And South America. He served as chairman of the German SMPTE section and as program chairman for European SMPTE conferences. He is an active member of several SMPTE engineering committees. Presently he is chairing a SMPTE study group on user requirements for future automated storage and retrieval systems.
Copyright
© 1999 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.
Source Data (JSON)

Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-M001190.json

Reference this Doc

Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
Jüergen Heitmann; The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190
Snippet:
Jüergen Heitmann; The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190

HTML (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
Jüergen Heitmann; The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190
Snippet:
<span class="citation">Jüergen Heitmann; <cite>The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?</cite>, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190</a></span>

SMPTE Icon SMPTE's HTML Pub

Preview:
Jüergen Heitmann; The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999); SMPTE, 1999
doi: 10.5594/M001190
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/M001190
Snippet:
<li>
Jüergen Heitmann; <cite id="bib-10-5594-m001190">The Application of MPEG-2 MP@ML within TV-Centers - Mandatory, Useful or a Nuisance?</cite>, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( July 1999); SMPTE, 1999
<span class="doi">10.5594/M001190</span>
</li>