API Build-data JSON Resources
Theme

Choose how MSRBot.io looks on this device.

Auto (match system) Light mode Dark mode

Preference is stored in this browser only.

SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000)
[ACTIVE]

Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data

Metadata

Publisher
SMPTE — White Plains, NY, USA
Doc Type
Journal Article
Content Type
Original Research
Abbreviated Title
SMPTE J
Volume
109, No. 2, pp. 114–117
Abstract
Progressive scan is favored over interlace by the computer industry and many proponents of video transmission systems because of the artifacts present in interlaced displays. Visibility of interlaced artifacts depends on the acquisition method, display, and viewing conditions. Perceived sharpness of an image is considerably less for an interlaced image than for a progressive image. The reasons for this will be explained based on visual perception data, and the differences in perceived sharpness will be quantified. All of the advantages of progressive scans can be realized with receiver signal processing of a standard interlaced transmission system provided the originating camera and final display are in progressive format. In that case, all interlaced artifacts will be removed, however, the vertical resolution will be slightly lower than with a progressive camera or film scanner.
Publication Date
2000-02-01
DOI
10.5594/J04264
ISSN
Print: 0036-1682
Link
https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264
Author(s)
William E. GlennFlorida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431
Copyright
© 2000 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.

Bibliographic Reference(s)

  • 1920 × 1080 Pixel Color Camera with a Progressive Scan Output at 60 Frames/Sec [Active]
  • 1. Ginsburg A. P. , “Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data,” Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Lab Tech Report 1978 : AMRL-TR-78-129. EXTERNAL
  • 2. DeValois R. L. DeValois K. K. , Spatial Vision , Oxford UP, 1988 . EXTERNAL
  • 4. Glenn W. E. , “Compatible 1080P Display Using 1080I Transmission,” (paper no. 26) presented at 140th SMPTE Technical Conference, Pasadena, CA, Oct. 1998 . EXTERNAL
Source Data (JSON)

Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-J04264.json

Reference Tree

Explore all references and references to this document, as a navigable tree.

Open Reference Tree
Reference this Doc

Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
William E. Glenn; Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data, SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000); SMPTE, 2000. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264
Snippet:
William E. Glenn; Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data, SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000); SMPTE, 2000. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264

HTML (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
William E. Glenn; Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data, SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000); SMPTE, 2000. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264
Snippet:
<span class="citation">William E. Glenn; <cite>Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data</cite>, SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000); SMPTE, 2000. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264</a></span>

SMPTE Icon SMPTE's HTML Pub

Preview:
William E. Glenn; Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data, SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000); SMPTE, 2000
doi: 10.5594/J04264
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/J04264
Snippet:
<li>
William E. Glenn; <cite id="bib-10-5594-j04264">Interlace and Progressive Scan Comparisons Based on Visual Perception Data</cite>, SMPTE Journal ( Volume: 109, Issue: 2, February 2000); SMPTE, 2000
<span class="doi">10.5594/J04264</span>
</li>

Referenced By