Current document root:
SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal ( Volume: 124, Issue: 7, October 2015)
State of HEVC Bitrates in 2014: Comparing HEVC, H.264, and MPEG-2
SMPTE • Journal Article • [Active]
Click a document below to open its own reference tree.
Referenced By
Docs that depend on State of HEVC Bitrates in 2014: Comparing HEVC, H.264, and MPEG-2
View:
·
Tree:
·
No entries.
References Of
Docs that State of HEVC Bitrates in 2014: Comparing HEVC, H.264, and MPEG-2 depend on
View:
·
Tree:
·
Level 1 — direct references (docs this doc cites)
- ITU-T REC H.264:2021-08[Active]
- ITU-T REC H.265:2019-11[Active]
- VideoLAN Organization, “x264,” http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html.EXTERNAL
- BrainFarm/Red Bull Media House.EXTERNAL
- MulticoreWare, “x265 Evaluator’s Guide,” http://www.x265.orghttp://www.x265.org.EXTERNAL
- G. J. Sullivan, H. Schwarz, T. Keng Tan, and T. Wiegand, “Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards—Including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC),” IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video. Tech., 22(12):1669-1684, Dec. 2012.EXTERNAL
- J. Pallett, “Bitrate Requirements for HEVC: Comparing H.265, H.264 and MPEG-2,” Proc. NAB Broadcast Engineering Conference, Las Vegas, Apr. 2014.EXTERNAL
- Blender Foundation, Tears of Steel, http://tearsofsteel.org.EXTERNAL
- Kai Zeng, Abdul Rehman, Jiheng Wang, and Wang Zhou, “From H.264 to HEVC: Coding Gain Predicted by Objective Video Quality Assessment Models,” Proc. Seventh International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, Scottsdale, AZ, Jan. 2013.EXTERNAL