A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT
Metadata
- Publisher
- SMPTE — White Plains, NY
- Doc Type
- Conference Paper
- Content Type
- Original Research
- Volume
- 1999, No. 8, pp. 1–16
- Abstract
- Over the last 18 months, high definition home entertainment systems have become available to the US consumer, albeit at a substantial price tag. These systems are based almost exclusively on direct view and rear projection CRT technology. More recently however, a number of manufacturers have made announcements portending the arrival of HDTV projection systems based on alternative display technologies such as transmissive and reflective LCD, and DLP™. Many of these announcements promise excellent image quality, but demonstrations of prototype systems have shown that there is much variability in subjective image quality from system to system. As the incumbent technology, direct view and rear projection CRT have set the image quality standard by which alternative technologies will be judged. Virtually all of the CRT's competitors in the HD arena are based on fixed matrix modulators with substantially different electronic and optical characteristics. It would be of interest to explore how these differences manifest themselves in terms of image quality relative to that of CRT technology. In this paper, we will examine some of the image quality characteristics of representative samples of several LCD and DLP based projection display technologies as compared to those of CRT-based HD sets. MTF characteristics will be compared, as well as quantitative image quality metrics utilizing several established methods.
- Publication Date
- 1999-11-01
- DOI
10.5594/M00324- Link
- https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324
- Author(s)
- Peter F. van KesselTexas Instruments Incorporated, Plano, TexasTerry A. BartlettTexas Instruments Incorporated, Plano, TexasScott DewaldTexas Instruments Incorporated, Plano, TexasGregory S. PettittTexas Instruments Incorporated, Plano, Texas
- Copyright
- © 1999 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.
Bibliographic Reference(s)
- 1. Sherr Sol , Electronic Displays , Second Edition , John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , New York ( 1993 ). EXTERNAL
- 2. Biberman L. C. , Image Quality , in Perception of Displayed Information , Biberman L. C. , ed., Plenum Press , New York ( 1973 ), pp. 11 – 86 . EXTERNAL
- 3. Holst G. C. , Sampling, Aliasing and Data Fidelity for Electronic Imaging Systems, Communications and Data Acquisition Systems , JCD Publishing , Winter Park, FL ( 1998 ), a) pp. 67 – 76 , b) pp. 293–322, c) pp. 160–166. EXTERNAL
- 4. Gonzalez R. C. Wintz P. , Digital Image Processing , Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. , Reading, MA ( 1977 ), pp. 58 – 67 . EXTERNAL
- 5. Schade O. H. , “Image Quality: A Comparison of Photographic and Television Systems,” Reprinted in SMPTE Journal Vol. 96, 1987 , pp. 567 – 648 . EXTERNAL
- 6. Barten P. G. J. , “The SQRI Method: A New Method for the Evaluation of Visible Resolution on a Display,” Proceedings of the SID , Vol. 28/3 , 1987 , pp 253 – 262 . EXTERNAL
Source Data (JSON)
Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-M00324.json
Reference Tree
Explore all references and references to this document, as a navigable tree.
Open Reference TreeReference this Doc
Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)
Preview:
Peter F. van Kessel, Terry A. Bartlett, Scott Dewald, and Gregory S. Pettitt; A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( November 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324
Snippet:
Peter F. van Kessel, Terry A. Bartlett, Scott Dewald, and Gregory S. Pettitt; A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( November 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324
HTML (ISO 690 compliant)
Preview:
Peter F. van Kessel, Terry A. Bartlett, Scott Dewald, and Gregory S. Pettitt; A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( November 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324
Snippet:
<span class="citation">Peter F. van Kessel, Terry A. Bartlett, Scott Dewald, and Gregory S. Pettitt; <cite>A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT</cite>, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( November 1999); SMPTE, 1999. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324</a></span>
SMPTE's HTML Pub
Preview:
Peter F. van Kessel, Terry A. Bartlett, Scott Dewald, and Gregory S. Pettitt; A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( November 1999); SMPTE, 1999
doi: 10.5594/M00324
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324
doi: 10.5594/M00324
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/M00324
Snippet:
<li> Peter F. van Kessel, Terry A. Bartlett, Scott Dewald, and Gregory S. Pettitt; <cite id="bib-10-5594-m00324">A Comparison of Alternative High Definition Display Technologies to CRT</cite>, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( November 1999); SMPTE, 1999 <span class="doi">10.5594/M00324</span> </li>