Automating HD Workflows: Future Challenges for MXF

Metadata

Publisher: SMPTE — White Plains, NY
Doc Type: Conference Paper
Content Type: Original Research
Volume: 2008, No. 1, pp. 1–10
Abstract: Nowadays, broadcasters are rapidly adopting integrated, file-based media production architectures for their back-end facilities, while simultaneously facing the transition from Standard Definition (SD) to High Definition (HD) Television. Broadcasters take full advantage of file-based workflows when they apply the standard file formats MXF and AAF to bring about the essential glue for the integration of production systems. Indeed, the use of MXF for the exchange of media materials in SD-TV production is widely accepted, but only because of continued efforts to keep the file format complexity low and because of rigorous testing procedures. In order to deal with interoperability issues, broadcaster-specific MXF Application Specifications have materialized that strictly define the rules of MXF usage in the broadcaster's production environment. These rules can differ per application (production, editing, play-out, archive) and quality level (compression format), and may evolve in due course. Based on the lessons learned for SD, this paper discusses MXF and AAF's far-reaching, future challenges for mixed SD/HD media production, taking into account the expected impact of HD on the technical architecture. In particular, the forthcoming adoption of the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm will increasingly enable the automation of broadcaster-specific workflows based on central, reusable services and human interactions. Firstly, HD-specific MXF requirements, such as surround sound and time labeling are elaborated. The use of additional metadata in MXF for further automating production workflows is mooted and a number of useful applications are suggested: media tracking, quality control and preservation, efficient repurposing based on audio-visual information, etc. Then, refinement of the current MXF strategy and the pros and cons of applying higher MXF operational patterns in order to improve efficiency in multi-platform production scenarios are contemplated on a per-application basis. Finally, an effective strategy is presented for automating the laborious MXF validation processes based on Application Specifications, and subsequent corrective updates, all realized in a service oriented way. The reflections presented in this paper are valuable for all technical practitioners facing the introduction of file-based workflows for SD and HD production.
Publication Date: 2008-10-01
DOI: 10.5594/M001047
Link: https://doi.org/10.5594/M001047
Author(s): Matthias De GeyterVRT Medialab Gaston Crommenlaan 10 — bus 101 9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
Dieter Van RijsselbergenGhent University — IBBT ELIS - Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 — bus 201 9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
Luk OvermeireVRT Medialab Gaston Crommenlaan 10 — bus 101 9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
Steven Van AsscheVRT Medialab Gaston Crommenlaan 10 — bus 101 9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
Rik Van de WalleGhent University — IBBT ELIS - Multimedia Lab Gaston Crommenlaan 8 — bus 201 9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
Keyword(s): MXF
Copyright: © 2008 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.

Bibliographic Reference(s)

ISBN.9780240806938 — Nick Wells, The MXF Book — Introduction to the Material eXchange Format, Elsevier Inc., 2006 EXTERNAL
[1] Mauthe A. Thomas P. Professional Content Management Systems . West Sussex, England , Jon Wiley & Sons Ltd , 2004 . EXTERNAL
[10] SMPTE 383M. Material Exchange Format (MXF) — Mapping AES3 and Broadcast Wave Audio into the MXF Generic Container , 2008 . EXTERNAL
[11] SMPTE 386M. Material Exchange Format (MXF) — Mapping D-10 Essence Data to the MXF Generic Container , 2004 . EXTERNAL
[12] SMPTE 331M. Element and Metadata Definitions for the SDTI-CP , 2004 . EXTERNAL
[13] SMPTE 12M-1. Time and Control Code , 2008 . EXTERNAL
[14] http://ftp.irt.de/IRT/mxf/tools/analyzer/index.php , IRT MXF Analyzer Pro. EXTERNAL
[15] http://www.metaglue.com , MXFixer tool. EXTERNAL
[16] ISO/IEC 19757—3:2006, Information technology - Document Schema Definition Language (DSDL) - Part 3: Rule-based validation - Schematron , 2006 . EXTERNAL
[17] Footen J. Faust J. The Service-Oriented Media Enterprise: SOA, BPM, and Web Services in Professional Media Systems . Focal Press Media Technology Professional, 2008 . EXTERNAL
[18] Erl T. . Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA): Concepts, Technology, and Design . Prentice Hall Service-Oriented Computing Series, 2005 . EXTERNAL
[19] Van Assche S. Van der Weken D. Muylaert B. Desmet S. Volckaert B. , “Automating Workflows in Media Production,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering (ENASE'2008), May 2008 , pp. 31 – 38 . EXTERNAL
[20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coupling_(computer_science) , low coupling in modular systems. EXTERNAL
[21] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohesion_(computer_science) , high cohesion in modular systems. EXTERNAL
[22] http://www.irt.de/en/activities/production/bmf.html . EXTERNAL
[3] Hoffman J. Soetens P. De Geyter M. , “An Integrated File-based Media Production Workflow: The Digital Media Factory,” Proc. IBC2007. EXTERNAL
[4] EBU P/META Metadata Exchange Scheme 2.0 , July 2007 . EXTERNAL
[5] EBU P/TVFile, EBU Recommendation R 122 — Material Exchange Format Timecode Implementation, February 2007 . EXTERNAL
[6] http://www.amwa.tv . EXTERNAL
[7] SMPTE 382M. Material Exchange Format (MXF) — Mapping AES3 and Broadcast Wave Audio into the MXF Generic Container , 2007 . EXTERNAL
[8] SMPTE 377M. Material Exchange Format (MXF) — File Format Specification , 2004 . EXTERNAL
[9] http://www.vrtmedialab.be/index.php/english/publications/spec_vrtml_20080925 . EXTERNAL

Source Data (JSON)

Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-M001047.json

Reference Tree

Explore all references and references to this document, as a navigable tree.

Open Reference Tree

Reference this Doc

Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:

Matthias De Geyter, Dieter Van Rijsselbergen, Luk Overmeire, Steven Van Assche, and Rik Van de Walle; Automating HD Workflows: Future Challenges for MXF, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( October 2008); SMPTE, 2008. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M001047

Snippet:

Matthias De Geyter, Dieter Van Rijsselbergen, Luk Overmeire, Steven Van Assche, and Rik Van de Walle; Automating HD Workflows: Future Challenges for MXF, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( October 2008); SMPTE, 2008. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/M001047

HTML (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:

Snippet:

<span class="citation">Matthias De Geyter, Dieter Van Rijsselbergen, Luk Overmeire, Steven Van Assche, and Rik Van de Walle; <cite>Automating HD Workflows: Future Challenges for MXF</cite>, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( October 2008); SMPTE, 2008. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/M001047" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/M001047</a></span>

SMPTE's HTML Pub

Preview:

Snippet:

<li>
Matthias De Geyter, Dieter Van Rijsselbergen, Luk Overmeire, Steven Van Assche, and Rik Van de Walle; <cite id="bib-10-5594-m001047">Automating HD Workflows: Future Challenges for MXF</cite>, SMPTE Meetings and Conferences ( October 2008); SMPTE, 2008
<span class="doi">10.5594/M001047</span>
</li>