API Build-data JSON Resources
Theme

Choose how MSRBot.io looks on this device.

Auto (match system) Light mode Dark mode

Preference is stored in this browser only.

Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952)
[ACTIVE]

Comparison of Recording Processes

Metadata

Publisher
SMPTE — White Plains, NY, USA
Doc Type
Journal Article
Content Type
Original Research
Abbreviated Title
J SMPTE
Volume
59, No. 4, pp. 313–318
Abstract
The three common forms of sound recording may be classed as mechanical (disk), photographic and magnetic. All three methods are in common use today and each is employed in a field for which it appears to be peculiarly fitted. The purpose of this article is to examine briefly the factors which determine the fidelity of each method. By fidelity we mean how true the tonal range can be reproduced, the amount and nature of harmonic distortion present, the signal-to-noise ratio possible with each method, and the amount of wow or flutter that may be expected under average conditions of reproduction for each recording process.
Publication Date
1952-10-01
DOI
10.5594/J01783
ISSN
Print: 0898-042X
Link
https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783
Author(s)
John G. FrayneJohn G. Frayne, Westrex Corp., 6601 Romaine St., Los Angeles 38, Calif.
Copyright
© 1952 Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, Inc.
Source Data (JSON)

Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-J01783.json

Reference Tree

Explore all references and references to this document, as a navigable tree.

Open Reference Tree
Reference this Doc

Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
John G. Frayne; Comparison of Recording Processes, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952); SMPTE, 1952. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783
Snippet:
John G. Frayne; Comparison of Recording Processes, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952); SMPTE, 1952. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783

HTML (ISO 690 compliant)

Preview:
John G. Frayne; Comparison of Recording Processes, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952); SMPTE, 1952. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783
Snippet:
<span class="citation">John G. Frayne; <cite>Comparison of Recording Processes</cite>, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952); SMPTE, 1952. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783</a></span>

SMPTE Icon SMPTE's HTML Pub

Preview:
John G. Frayne; Comparison of Recording Processes, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952); SMPTE, 1952
doi: 10.5594/J01783
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/J01783
Snippet:
<li>
John G. Frayne; <cite id="bib-10-5594-j01783">Comparison of Recording Processes</cite>, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers ( Volume: 59, Issue: 4, October 1952); SMPTE, 1952
<span class="doi">10.5594/J01783</span>
</li>

Referenced By