16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production
Metadata
- Publisher
- SMPTE
- Doc Type
- Journal Article
- Article Type
- research-article
- Abstract
- The apparent economic advantages of changing from 35mm to 16mm are evaluated in relation to quality of picture and sound. Also considered are the human and economic factors of converting to 16mm equipment.
- Publication Date
- 1970-12-01
- DOI
10.5594/J00843- Link
- https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843
- Author(s)
- Eliot Bliss
Source Data (JSON)
Full registry record with provenance metadata. Open directly: /api/doc/10.5594-J00843.json
Reference this Doc
Plain text (ISO 690 compliant)
Preview:
Eliot Bliss; 16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production, Journal of the SMPTE ( Volume: 79, Issue: 12, December 1970); SMPTE, 1970. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843
Snippet:
Eliot Bliss; 16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production, Journal of the SMPTE ( Volume: 79, Issue: 12, December 1970); SMPTE, 1970. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843
HTML (ISO 690 compliant)
Preview:
Eliot Bliss; 16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production, Journal of the SMPTE ( Volume: 79, Issue: 12, December 1970); SMPTE, 1970. Available at https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843
Snippet:
<span class="citation">Eliot Bliss; <cite>16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production</cite>, Journal of the SMPTE ( Volume: 79, Issue: 12, December 1970); SMPTE, 1970. Available at <a href="https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843</a></span>
SMPTE's HTML Pub
Preview:
Eliot Bliss; 16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production, Journal of the SMPTE ( Volume: 79, Issue: 12, December 1970); SMPTE, 1970
doi: 10.5594/J00843
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843
doi: 10.5594/J00843
url: https://doi.org/10.5594/J00843
Snippet:
<li> Eliot Bliss; <cite id="bib-10-5594-j00843">16mm versus 35mm Film for Television Production</cite>, Journal of the SMPTE ( Volume: 79, Issue: 12, December 1970); SMPTE, 1970 <span class="doi">10.5594/J00843</span> </li>